20 August 2025
Faculty & Staff Planning Workshop 2025 in Mataas na Kahoy, Batangas
09 February 2025
IGU-CSRS: Call for Abstracts, Pt 1
32nd International Geographical Union-Commission on the Sustainability of Rural Systems (IGU-CSRS Colloquium)
New Ruralities: Contestations and Iterations on Rural Spatialities
University of the Philippines Diliman & University of the Philippines Baguio
1-6 December 2025
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS
In the Handbook of Rural Studies (2006), Paul Cloke argued that the shift from the functional and political-economic lenses in studying rural studies, to a more socially-constructed framing where the “importance of the ‘rural’ lies in the fascinating world of social, cultural and moral values that have become associated with rurality, rural spaces and rural life” (2006, 21) opened the rural geographies to conceptual and methodological richness.
In recent decades, rural areas have undergone profound transformations influenced by factors such as globalization, technological advancements, climate change, migration, and shifting economic paradigms. These forces challenge traditional notions of rurality and spatial organization, compelling scholars, policymakers, and local communities to re-examine and redefine rural spaces. Additionally, rethinking established concepts and approaches in the study of the rural along with the recognition that, following Michael Woods (2009, 855), there is an “uneven capacity of rural geography in different national contexts to engage appropriate conceptual tools”. Rural spatialities, therefore, can benefit from the blurring of boundaries, the recognition of multiple rural relationalities, and the connections that are forged from these complex entanglements.
The idea of 'new ruralities' centers on the multiple meanings and dynamic character of rural systems, as tied to wider local, regional and international linkages and processes. New ruralities are about development trajectories that are created by new connections, opportunities, and innovations. They are about adaptation and resistance that facilitate the reproduction of rural identities and experiences. Lastly, new ruralities include new perspectives that illuminate unique spatialities of the rural across locations and contexts.
The 32nd IGU-CSRS Colloquium provides a valuable platform for scholars, practitioners and policy makers to exchange ideas, share knowledge, and develop a deeper understanding of rural spaces to contribute to more informed and effective rural development strategies geared toward sustainability.
The four (4) sub-themes cover a broad range of topics that reflect the complexities of rural spaces and their evolving nature in the context of local and global challenges:
1. ITERATIONS: recurring patterns, practices, and historical continuities
2. TRANSITIONS: structural, socio-cultural, economic, and environmental shifts
3. NEGOTIATIONS: navigation of policies, markets, and socio-environmental changes
4. CONTESTATIONS: conflicts over land, resources, identities, and power
We invite scholars, researchers, and practitioners to submit their panel, paper, or poster abstracts of not more than 300 words through this link: http://bit.ly/3CzPvzN. The deadline for submission is 21 April 2025.
32nd IGU-CSRS Organizing Committee
E-mail: igu.csrs.ph@gmail.com
Microsite: https://sites.google.com/up.edu.ph/igu-csrs2025
__________________________
Texts Consulted
Cloke, P. 2006: Conceptualizing rurality. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. and Mooney, P.H., (eds.), Handbook of rural studies, London: Sage, 18–28.
Woods, M. 2009. Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections, Progress in human geography, 36(1), 125–134.
Woods, M. 2011. Rural geography III: Rural futures and the future of rural geography, Progress in human geography, 33(6), 849–858.
15 March 2020
The Department of Geography is on skeletal force due to coronavirus
13 September 2019
TANAW: Geography Department Welcome Assembly
06 September 2019
Prof Joseph Palis is the new director of the Third World Studies Center.
27 August 2019
UP Diliman Department of Geography Social Media Accounts
04 April 2019
LAGOM: Geog Week 2019 Culmination Night
![]() |
| Students and faculty of the Department |
![]() |
| Joel Licup, Geography Department Student Representative (right) and Miguel Garcia, Geography Week Director (left) receive certificates of appreciation. |
Read about the Geography Week 2019 events here:
- Bukana: Exhibit Opening
- Tugatog: Career Orientation
- Balintataw: Artist Talk of Ms. Annie Lumbao
- Malaya: Women in Geography
- Aguhon: Geog 192 Field Presentations
- Balikwas: Countermapping
- Sipat: Mapathon
- Lagom: Culmination Night
20 September 2018
Department of Geography Holds Curriculum and Administrative Workshop
By Marion Micah Tinio and Joseph Palis
Attended by the regular and part-time faculty, administrative and research staff, the four-day workshop resulted in the formulation of an updated Vision and Mission for the Department, strategic scheduling of Departmental events for the academic year, discussions and clarifications of various teaching, research, extension and administrative tasks. Team building activities were actively participated in by the members of the faculty and staff to foster collegiality and camaraderie.
Visit the Department Website to learn more about its members.
Dr. Palis Showcases Countergeographies in Talk
![]() |
| Photo by Raquel Borje |
In 2010 Denis Wood argued: “…[A]mong counter-mapping strategies, none mounts the assault on the prerogatives of professional mapmakers that map art does, art … made as, with, or about maps (2010, 189; emphasis in original). This presentation discusses processual practices of countermapping in the Philippines: art maps which are reconfigurations and re-assemblies of ‘official’ maps and whose creation and authentication were legitimized by hegemonic state power to represent the modern nation-state. In the case of Filipino artist Cian Dayrit’s countermapped art works, these are interventions that interrogate the role of state power in standardizing and legitimizing a specific and particular brand of nationalism. Dayrit’s cartographically-informed art incorporates maps that destabilize the emblem of imperial and colonial power. Likewise, the art works of Mark Salvatus and Mideo Cruz embody the emotional and affective geographies of urban subalterns who navigate the labyrinth of institutionally and discursively violent terrains of Metro Manila. The maps provide an alternative representation of geoaffective dislocations and institutionalized marginalization due spatial elitism. I argue that these cartographic efforts and interventionist art maps assist in destabilizing commonly-held cartographic imaginations that were shaped and reinforced by normalized state violence abetted by vestiges of colonial legacies in the Philippines.









